Campaign Bulletin - Spring 2001 JUSTICE FOR MARK BARNSLEY CAMPAIGN
SPRING 2001 MARK BARNSLEY REJECTS PAROLE AS SEVENTH XMAS BEHIND BARS APPROACHES
On the 8th of December, 2000, Mark was
invited to apply for parole for the second year running. Once more, he
rejected the offer. As he has stated previously: "I am an innocent man
and freedom is my right, I am not prepared to compromise myself by submitting
to any form of conditional release. If that means spending extra years
incarcerated in top security prisons, then it is a price I am prepared
to pay, albeit regrettably. My life has been completely destroyed by the
terrible injustice that I have suffered, all that I have left are my principles
and integrity, and I am not prepared to compromise them by bending my knee
to the parole board."
SHEFFIELD CPS IN THE SPOTLIGHT AGAIN.
On Tuesday, 19 Dec. 2000, about 20 campaign supporters entered the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) offices in Sheffield to protest the continued imprisonment of local man Mark Barnsley, and the withholding of vital evidence from his defence by the CPS. The campaign was later informed that: Entrance was gained easily by some smartly dressed people, and then everyone else ran inside and up stairs to the upper offices. The invasion and occupation caused a major disturbance and CPS workers were left with no uncertainty about the strength of feeling about this miscarriage of justice. Leaflets were given to all the staff stating: "The CPS have framed Mark Barnsley... they would like to think that he doesn't exist, but we won't forget... if they won't release the evidence then we will just go look for it ourselves".
Unfortunately there is a police station next door to the CPS building. The police arrived very quickly and people were ejected from the building. A large banner proclaiming "Free Mark Barnsley" was hung from trees right outside the building so passers-by knew what was going on. Local press were in attendance and the action appeared later on regional TV evening news. In total 16 people were arrested. They were held for up to 10 hours and all charged with "conspiracy to burgle, with intent"! All answered 'no comment' when questioned by the police. They were then bailed to appear at Hull Magistrates Court (they cannot be prosecuted by Sheffield CPS) on 9th of January for what could be an interesting court case. All the defendants have plead 'not guilty' to the charges.
Potentially, all the CPS' dirty laundry in relation to the evidence they have been withholding in Mark's case could be aired in public. This may explain why on the 9th of January, the case was adjourned until 13th of March, giving CPS Headquarters in London a couple of months to scratch their heads over what to do next.
MAKE SOME MORE NOISE AT WAKEFIELD PRISON.
SATURDAY 24th MARCH 2001.
Meet: 12 (Midday)
At: Wakefield Westgate Train Station.
It's time to pump up the volume again!
Bring banners, friends and importantly anything that makes a racket: instruments,
drums, tin cans, fog horns, whistles, megaphones.. Like the last demo -
no musical ability required but please try and arrive on time so we can
all start together. On the day, Mark Barnsley will go on a 24 hour hunger
strike, supported by several other prisoners at HMP Wakefield who have
been moved there as punishment.
We hope that as many supporters as possible will show solidarity with Mark's struggle by attending this important demonstration.
MASS FAX & PHONE-IN: Wednesday 28th
March.
To Governor David Shaw at HMP Wakefield
.
FAX: 01924 299 315 &
TELEPHONE: 01924 378282
DEMAND THAT MARK BARNSLEY BE MOVED OUT OF WAKEFIELD PRISON! - HARASSMENT OF MARK BARNSLEY MUST BE STOPPED!
After lying dormant for several months, the prison service campaign of harassment against Mark Barnsley has once again reared it's ugly head. Since mid January, day to day life for Mark has steadily got worse, as the prison service try and disrupt his struggle for justice. On 17th of January 2001, Mark was suddenly taken off the prison wing and put in segregation at HMP Frankland, along with two other prisoners, for no justifiable reason. He was officially segregated under the 'Good Order And Discipline' rule, accused with 'fomenting unrest on the wing'. Later, 'planning a protest' was added to the charge.
The prison has yet to come up with a single incident, which would support these allegations. There had been absolutely no 'trouble' or 'unrest' on the wing. We can only conclude that officials at Frankland are extremely paranoid or invented this feeble excuse to get rid of Mark. On 1st of February, after spending 2 weeks in segregation at HMP Frankland, Mark Barnsley was woken up at 5.30 am and moved to HMP Wakefield in West Yorkshire. This was Mark's 20th prison move to date. As Wakefield is primarily a high security prison for sex offenders it is certainly one of the worst places they could send Mark, who has 3 children.
The regime at Wakefield is also notorious for it's strict and petty rules and more like something from the 1950's. Moving Mark to Wakefield is clearly a way to further punish him. On arrival at HMP Wakefield, Mark was kept in a dungeon-like, unheated Segregation cell for a further 2 weeks and given only one blanket for warmth. Considering the freezing temperatures recently, this amounts to nothing less than torture. He was denied access to all his property and was even denied a hot drink and a shower. The only exercise he got outside his cell was in a cage. The only mail he is allowed are letters (and an s.a.e. if one is enclosed) and publications sent direct from the publishers. A lot of his mail continues to be withheld, even when it meets the prisons' own strict criteria.
On several occasions even Mark's legal mail has been opened and withheld, in open disregard of prison guidelines. A few days after arriving at HMP Wakefield (in what can only be seen as an act of provocation) Mark was told he was being put on one of the wings, in a dormitory with sex offenders! Not surprisingly he refused and was sent back to segregation, this time on a charge. When Mark was eventually given a single cell, again it was unheated and in the coldest part of the prison. The cell had previously been 'condemned'. Yet another act of punishment. This catalogue of abuse stands in stark contrast to claims made by the Governor of Wakefield Prison, who expects us to believe that Mark's move there was just a 'routine allocation'. It is very clear that moving Mark to Wakefield Prison was nothing less than a cynical attempt to isolate him from supporters and set him up for further punishment.
WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP.
The campaign hopes that as many people as possible will continue keep up the pressure on the authorities by:
* Coming to the next 'Noise Demo' at Wakefield
Prison on Saturday 24th of March (see above).
* Taking part in the 'Mass Phone/ Fax
In' on the 28th of March. * Sending protest letters, faxes and phone-calls
to the prison officials listed below.
* Sending a message of support to Mark
(enclose an s.a.e. and a few sheets of paper so he can reply Mark Barnsley
WA2897 - HMP Wakefield, 5 Love Lane, Wakefield, WF2 9AG.
30th of March is Mark's 40th Birthday by
the way! Please do all you can to demand that Mark be immediately moved
out of Wakefield Prison.
Stress that HMP Wakefield, which is a
'Category A' prison, is clearly not a suitable place for Mark who is a
lower 'Cat. B' prisoner. That it is outrageous that he is being expected
to live with sex offenders under high security conditions. That he has
not been classed as a security risk prisoner so should be sent to a lower
security prison. Demand that Mark be moved to a local prison where he will
not be isolated from his family (for example the lower security, Cat B.
training prison, HMP Garth in Lancashire).
Please continue to send Letters, faxes and phone-calls to the following:
DAVID SHAW GOVERNOR
HMP WAKEFIELD
5 LOVE LANE WAKEFIELD WF2 9AG
ENGLAND
MARTIN NAREY -DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS
BILL BADE - DIRECTORATE OF HIGH SECURITY PRISONS
PETER ATHERTON - DIRECTOR OF HIGH SECURITY
PRISONS
FAX: (+) 0207 2176664
The above three can all be written to (separately)
at:
PRISON SERVICE HQ
CLELAND HOUSE PAGE STREET
LONDON SWT 4LN
ENGLAND
Supporters outside Britain could also protest
about Mark's current situation at British Embassies and Consulates etc.
NOISY PROTEST AT WAKEFIELD PRISON
As Mark's situation got worse in Wakefield prison, the campaign called for Sunday, 25th of February to be a 'Day of Action-In solidarity with Mark Barnsley'. We asked people to protest the punishment Mark has been receiving > at HMP Wakefield and demand that he be moved to a more suitable prison.
Outside Wakefield prison itself, about 35 of Mark's supporters successfully held a 'Noise Demo'. According to one participant: "We made so much noise! We had bass and snare drums, cooking pans and wooden spoons, whistles, fog horns, a mini sound system, and even some very loud fireworks! We stayed outside the main gate for about three quarters of an hour and then paraded all around the prison walls for another half hour, making a huge racket and amusing the local kids. We handed out about 400 leaflets, lots of them to visitors coming out who were apparently very supportive. A very good day and I think everyone really enjoyed it. I hope that Mark could hear it. The prison walls are very high".
Mark in fact could hear everything and shortly after the demo he was moved to another cell which at least has heating. However, apart from this small concession, the harassment against Mark continues at Wakefield Prison. Over the past few weeks, Mark's visitors have only been able to see him in 'closed visits', separated by thick glass. Numerous items of Mark's mail never reach him and even a letter from the CCRC was opened by the prisons' in-house 'security' and is still being withheld from him.
Mark thanks everyone who turned up to the demo or have expressed their concern to the prison governor and prison service officials over the last few weeks. We urge you to please keep up the pressure until he is moved. (Please see above > for details of the next 'Noise Demo'). On The Legal Front - We are very pleased that Mark has at long last found a decent legal team in the form of Vicky King and Daniel Guedalla of Thanki Novy Taube Solicitors. Both of whom have been very supportive of Mark in the past and given us valuable advice. > > Ideas into Action - In December last year, a talk was given to Church > leaders (including 3 Bishops) in Sheffield.
We are pleased to hear that the presentation, detailing all aspects of Mark's case, was well received and at least one of the Bishops present has made further enquiries at the Home Office about Mark. On another occasion, supporters leafleted 100's of cyclists attending a 'Critical Mass' protest in London. Gigs and other events around the country also continue to be leafleted and Mark's case is attracting growing interest from abroad via the internet. We hope that supporters will continue to take up some of the suggestions in our 'Ideas for Action'. Please also feel free to suggest new ideas to us. Writers & Bands Needed - The campaign will have a new pamphlet available later in the year, consisting of a collection of contributions from people familiar with Mark's case. As well as looking at different aspects of Mark's case in more detail, it is hoped that the pamphlet will explore the wider issues around 'miscarriages of justice'.
We're still looking for contributions for the pamphlet, so please let us know if you want to contribute or have an idea for an article. Also being put together is a benefit compilation CD for the campaign which will hopefully be ready by the summer. Bands to contributed tracks so far include: The Warriors, Attila The Stockbroker, Reazione, Norm Rejection, Red Alert, Violent Affray, Contempt, Rough Kutz & The Templars. Any other bands out there, who'd like to appear on this CD, please get in touch as soon as possible.
One way you could help get Mark's case
mentioned in the media (letters pages in newspapers and magazines,
radio phone-ins, internet 'chat rooms' etc.) is to respond quickly
to articles which raise issues relevant to Mark's case. Cases involving
students being given lenient sentences, stabbings, assaults or Judge
Peter Baker (the judge in Mark's trial) are a few examples.
THE CAMPAIGN GETS ACTIVE IN LONDON.
A London supporters' group has now begun to meet on a regular basis. The group decided that it would seek to actively publicise Mark's case to as wide an audience as possible. All London Trade Union branches were sent an information pack (with some response from the RMT and TGWU already) and a number of gigs have already been leafleted (Primal Scream, The Pogues, Pete Wylie). The group also decided to help build Paddy Hill's Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (MOJO) as part of the campaign to free Mark Barnsley, so that we could share experiences with, and show solidarity to others in a similar position. In December we helped MOJO stage a benefit with the Alabama 3, Mark Thomas and Jeremy Hardy.
We have joined demonstrations at the High Court organised by the friends and family of Eddie Gilfoyle, and turned out to show solidarity with the friends and family of Michael Stone at his recent successful appeal. On 20th January, we held a picket of Paul Boateng's surgery in Harlesden, to protest Mark's continued victimisation by the prison system, the delay in allocation of a CCRC case worker to Mark's case and the non-disclosure of evidence by Sheffield CPS. Boateng refused to attend his surgery without a police escort, leaving 40 angry constituents out in the snow.
All the constituents were supportive of the picket, and we were also able to point some of them towards more useful sources of advice than the cashmere-clad Prisons Minister. Boateng amused those of us who went in to see him by > ranting that "This government has done more for justice than any in living > memory" (anyone who wants to book him for a comedy gig should ring the Home Office on 020 72733906) but has done nothing to investigate the issues raised with him.
We will therefore be picketing his surgery again on the 17th of March (see below). One MP who has been of great help to us though is John McDonnell, MP for Hayes, who has been unrelenting in raising both Mark's conviction -and his subsequent victimisation- with the Home Office and Prison Service. On 20th February, we held a picket at the Prison Services Headquarters. About 20 people, including representatives from MOJO and Kent Alliance Against Injustice, handed out leaflets detailing Mark's situation. The picket was well received by the public. Later the Home Office was also picketed.
The Prison Service later expressed concern
to Mark's solicitor. Well, the solution is quite simple really. Stop
the victimisation of Mark Barnsley and move him out of the high security
prison system to a place more appropriate to his category. We meet
now on a monthly basis and intend to organise at least one activity
a month to keep Mark's case in the public eye. If you live in the London
> area and want to get involved with local campaign activities, please
phone > Nick on: 0208 9619808
PICKET AT THE SURGERY OF HOME OFFICE
MINISTER PAUL BOATENG
AT: HARLESDEN LIBRARY, HARLESDEN,
LONDON, NW10.
ASSEMBLE: 9.30AM, SATURDAY, 17th MARCH,
2001.
Nearest Tube: Willesden Junction
Bus: Number 18 (from Euston or Baker
Street)
The Justice for Mark Barnsley campaign
will be holding another picket to publicise Mark's case at the next
Surgery of the Home Office Minister for Prisons, Paul Boateng. We
will continue to raise with Boateng: Mark's victimisation by the
prison system, the delay in allocation of a CCRC case worker to Mark's
case and the non-disclosure of evidence by Sheffield CPS. All supporters
in the London area are encouraged to come along to help make the
day a success. Hope to see you there! The following article, by Mark Barnsley,
appeared in 'Tribune' - 29th December 2000.
APPEAL SYSTEM IN THE DOCK.
It is high time the legal system provided adequate means of redress for the victims of miscarriages of justice, pleads Mark Barnsley. There is a certain current of thought which supposes that prisons are full of people falsely protesting their innocence (and probably living the "high life" behind bars, while legally aided fat-cats make a mockery of the judicial system to win their release on legal technicalities).
This current of thought is very convenient for myopic politicians and the legal establishment, and like many examples of what is often referred to as the "popular imagination" it probably has more to do with opportunism of right wing journalists than innate public perception. None the less, it is undoubtedly the case that many people believe this sort of rubbish.
I am sure that there are plenty of criminals who go to trial wrongly protesting their innocence. Some of these will be acquitted, and the more successful they are as criminals (and consequently the more money they have made) the greater the chance of that, since they will be able to afford expensive lawyers, instead of having to rely on the dwindling legal aid system. But most of those coming before the criminal courts do not have money, and many who are genuinely innocent are wrongly convicted. Following conviction, of course, we have an appeal system. But one only has to look at the amount of time spent in prison by those who have successfully challenged miscarriages of justice over the past couple of decades to see how ineffective the appeal system is.
Talk to any barrister, and even the most competent of them will not be able to put their hand on their heart (or wallet) and tell you the system works effectively. Talk to any wrongfully convicted prisoner, and their response is likely to be more robustly effusive. The fact is that following conviction, and certainly following the denial of appeal, any prisoner who continues to falsely protest their innocence would have to be stark staring mad. Who but those who feel the genuine weight of legal injustice would struggle on to fight their convictions without legal aid and sometimes without any legal help at all, with access to only the most basic of law books, frustrated at every turn by the mandarins of the judicial system, and often knowing that fixed sentences are likely to be served long before any eventual appeal is successful?
Even more morally repugnant is the way that those protesting miscarriages of justice are doubly punished while they are in prison. Most obviously, those maintaining their innocence, and consequently not addressing their "offending behaviour", do not get parole. If they are life-sentence prisoners they may never be released, but even those serving fixed terms will spend longer, often much longer, in prison than if they were guilty of the crimes for which they have been locked- up. They will also serve their time in conditions of higher security than those who progress through the system by taking part in "sentence planning". Forget about the home-leaves and the town visits we frequently read about in the Right-Wing press. The challenge to the system made by prisoners who refuse to take part in > sentence planning and offending behaviour courses marks them out as troublesome and subversive.
Many of those fighting miscarriages of justice often find themselves subject to inter-prison moves ("ghostings") and periods of segregation, as well as other harassment. Even on a day-to-day basis, wrongfully convicted prisoners suffer as a result of being penalised by the so-called "Incentives and Earned Privileges Scheme". This pernicious device was introduced in the mid 1990's as part of a package of repression, and effectively created a state-defined class-system in British prisons. Under the scheme, prisoners are classified as "Basic", "Standard" or "Enhanced", depending on their general behaviour and overall level of compliance.
These categorisations define the conditions they are held in and the "privileges" they are allowed. Since 1997, a willingness to take part in sentence planning and attend offending behaviour courses has been an integral part of the scheme, with > those who refuse being denied "Enhanced" status. This means that appellants are not only likely to spend longer in prison, and in conditions of greater> security, but they will get less visits, less wages, poorer jobs, be able to spend less of their own money, be locked in their cells for longer, have poorer living facilities, less gym, and be penalised in a whole number of other petty and spiteful ways. Conformity is everything in prison, and those who do not conform absolutely will be punished. In these circumstances, only those with integrity, spirit, determination > and patience in ample quantities continue to fight to clear their names.
The sheer awfulness of injustice gives many these qualities in abundance, > but others are crushed, and driven to suicide or insanity by a system that is rotten to the core. > The simple fact is that prisoners who claim that they are innocent very often are innocent, and the failings of a legal system which cannot speedily > address miscarriages of justice are being compounded by a penal system that > torments those who are wrongly incarcerated.
YOU CAN CONTACT THE CAMPAIGN AT THE
FOLLOWING:
Write to: Justice for Mark Barnsley
PO Box 381, Huddersfield, HD13XX.
Justice for Mark Barnsley (Ireland)
PO Box 1290, Belfast, BT12 7BW.
Tel: 07944 522001
E-mail: barnsleycampaign@hotmail.com
visit the campaign web site at: www.freemarkbarnsley.com
For the moment you can write to Mark
directly at his new address:
Mark Barnsley WA2897-
HMP Wakefield,
5 Love Lane,
Wakefield, WF2 9AG,
England.
Comedy - Benefit Gig in Sheffield
For The Robert Hamill Justice Campaign.
We just recieved news that comedian Jeremy Hardy will be appearing at City Hall on Thursday 22 March. Tickets are £8/£10 (box office - 0114 2789 789).
In 1997, Robert Hamill was kicked to death by a large mob of Loyalists whilst walking home in Portadown, N. Ireland, in full view of an RUC Land Rover. Yet the armed RUC officers remained in their vehicle until after the attack, ignoring pleas for them to intervene. It wasn't until 13 days later, after Robert had died, that any arrests were made. The injustice in the Robert Hamill case is truly shocking. We hope that our supporters in Sheffield will show solidarity with the campaign, run by Robert's family, by helping to make this benefit gig a success.