|
The source of this file was found at
http://www.people.memphis.edu/~dhenke/shiva.htm
on Denny Henke's Liberated
I had been invited as a speaker on a panel on Women's Knowledge, Biotechnology and International Trade - Fostering A New Dialogue into the Next Millenium" at the International Conference on Women and Agriculture which is being organised by the Government of Canada but sponsored by Monsanto. This conference in my view is an attempt to co-opt women into passive partners in Monsanto's totalitarian empire. I would have liked to personally challenge the assumption that Third World women farmers are partners in the projects of engineering of crops and patenting of seed. However, it was impossible for me to travel all the way to Washington due to high pressure of commitments and non-stop travel within India and I sent the Women in Agriculture Conference the enclosed paper as my contribution. Please do circulate it to others to expose the attempt by the biotechnology industry and agribusiness as well as governments of US and Canada to co-opt feminism in the service of capitalist patriarchy's life threatening projects With best wishes,
|
|
by Dr. Vandana Shiva Statement by
I am writing this statement from beauiful Doon Valley in the Himalaya where the monsoons have arrived, and our Navdanya (Nine Seeds - Our National Movement on conservation of Biodiversity) team is busy with transplanting over 300 rice varieties which we are conserving along with the rich diversity of other agricultural crops. Our farm does not use any chemicals or external inputs. It is a self-regenerative system which preserves biodiversity while meeting human needs and needs of farm animals. Our 2 bullocks are the alternative to chemical fertilisers which pollute soil and water as well as to tractors and fossil fuels which pollute the atmosphere and destabilise the climate. (1) One of the rice varieties we conserve and grow is basmati, the aromatic rice for which Dehra Dun is famous. The basmati rice which farmers in my valley have been growing for centuries is today being claimed as "an instant invention of a novel rice line" by a U.S. Corporation called RiceTec (no.5,663,454).(2) The "neem" which our mothers and grandmothers have used for centuries as a pesticide and fungicide has been patented for these uses by W.R. Grace another U.S. Corporation. (3) We have challenged Grace's patent with the Greens in European Parliament in the European Patent Office. This phenomena of biopiracy through which western corporations are stealing centuries of collective knowledge and innovation carried out by Third world women is now reaching epidemic proportions. Such "biopiracy" is now being justified as a new "partnership" between agribusiness and Third world women. for us, theft cannot be the basis of partnership. Partnership implies equality and mutual respect. This would imply that there is no room for biopiracy and that those who have engaged in such piracy apologise to those they have stolen from and whose intellectual and natural creativity they want to undermine through IPR (Intellectual Property Right) monopolies. Partnership with Third world women necessitates changes in the WTO/TRIPS agreement which protects the pirates and punishes the original innovators as in the case of the U.S./India TRIPS agreement. (4) It also requires changes in the U.S. Patent Act which allows rampant piracy of our biodiversity related knowledge. These changes are essential to ensure that our collective knowledge and innovation is protected and women are recognised and respected as knowers and biodiversity experts.(5) Women farmers have been the seed keepers and seed breeders over millenia. The basmati is just one among 100,000 varieties of rice evolved by Indian farmers. Diversity and perenniality is our culture of the seed. In Central India, which is the Vavilov Centre of rice diversity, at the beginning of the agricultural season, farmers gather at the village deity, offer their rice varieties and then share the seeds. This annual festival of "Akti" rejuvenates the duty of saving and sharing seed among farming communities. It establishes partnership among farmers and with the earth. IPRs on seeds are however, criminalising this duty to the earth and to each other by making seed saving and seed exchange illegal. The attempt to prevent farmers from saving seed is not just being made through new IPR laws, it is also being made through the new genetic engineering technologies. Delta and Pine Land (now owned by Monsanto) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have established new partnership through a jointly held patent (N0. 5723785) to seed which has been genetically engineered to ensure that it does not germinate on harvest thus forcing farmers to buy seed at each planting season. Termination of germination is a means for capital accumulation and market expansion. However, abundance in nature and for farmers shrinks as markets grow for Monsanto. When we sow seed, we pray, "May this seed be exhaustless". Monsanto and the USDA on the other hand are stating, "Let this seed be terminated so that our profits and monopoly is exhaustless." There can be no partnership between the terminator logic which destroys nature's renewability and regeneration and the committment to continuity of life held by women farmers of the Third World. The two world views do not merely clash - they are mutually exclusive. there can be no partnership between a logic of death on which Monsanto bases its expanding empire and the logic of life on which women farmers in the Third World base their partnership with the earth to provide food security to their families and communities. There are other dimensions of the mutually exclusive interests and perspectives of women farmers of the Third World and biotechnology corporations such as Monsanto. The most widespread application of genetic engineering in agriculture is herbicide resistance i.e. the breeding of crops to be resistant to herbicides. Monsanto's Roundup Ready soya and Cotton are examples of this application. When introduced to Third World farming systems, this will lead to increased use of agri-chemicals thus increasing environmental problems. It will also destroy the biodiversity that is the sustenance and livelihood base of rural women. Whatweeds are for Monsanto , are food, are fodder and medicine for Third World Women. In Indian agriculture women use 150 different species of plants for vegetables, fodder and health care. In West Bengal 124 "weed" species collected from rice fields have economic importance for farmers.(6) In the Expana region of Veracruz, Mexico, peasants utilise about 435 wild plant and animal species of which 229 are eaten.(7) The spread of Roundup Ready crops would destroy this diversity and the value it provides to farmers. It would also undermine the soil conservation functions of cover crops and crop mixtures, thus leading to accelerated soil erosion. Contrary to Monsanto myths, Rounup Ready crops are a recipe for soil erosion, not a method for soil conservation. (8) Instead of falsely labelling the patriarchal projects of intellectual property rights on seed and genetic engineering in agriculture which are destroying biodiversity and the small farmers of the Third World as "partnership" with Third World women, it would be more fruitful to redirect agricultural policy towards women centred systems which promote biodiversity based small farm agriculture. A common myth used by MOnsanto and the biotechnology industry is that without genetic engineering the world cannot be fed. However, while biotechnology is projected as increasing food production four times, small ecological farms have productivity hundreds of times higher than large industrial farms based on conventional farms. (9) Women farmers in the Third World are predominantly samll farmers. (10) They provide the basis of food security, and they provide food security in partnership with other species. The partnership between women and biodiversity has kept the world fed through history, at present, and will feed the world in the future. It is this partnership that needs to be preserved and promoted to ensure food security. Agriculture based on diversity, decentralisation and improving farm productivity through ecological methods is a women-centred, nature friendly agriculture. In this women-centred agriculture, knowledge is shared, other species and plants are kin, not "property", and sustainability is based on renewal of the earths fertility and renewal and regeneration of biodiversity and species richness on farms to provide internal inputs. In our paradigms, there is no place for monocultures of genetically engineered crops and IPR monopolies on seeds. Moncultures and monopolies sympolise a masculinisation of agriculture. The war mentality underlying military-industrial agriculture is evident from the names given to herbicides which destroy the economic basis of the survival of the poorest women in the rural areas of the Third World. Monsanto's herbicides are called "Round Up", "Machete", "Lasso",. American Home Products which has merged with Monsanto calls its herbicides, "Pentagon", "Prowl", "Scepter", "Squadron", "Cadre", "Lightening", "Assert", "Avenge>". This is the language of war, not sustainability. Sustainability is based
on peace with the earth
Genetic engineering and IPRs will rob Third World women and their creativity, innovation and decision making power in agriculture. In place of women deciding what is grown in fields and served in kitchens, agriculture based on globalisation, genetic engineering and corporate monopolies on seeds will establish a food system and world view in which men controlling global corporations control what is grown in our fields and what we eat. corporate men investing financial capital in theft and biopiracy will present themselves as creators and owners of life. We do not want a partnership in this violent usurpation of the creativity of creation and Third World women by global biotechnology corporations who call themselves the "Life Sciences Industry" even while they push millions of species and millions of small farmers to extinction. (12) Reference
a. Cultivating Diversity: Biodiversity Conservation and the Politics of the Seed, Reserach Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy (RFSTNRP), New Dlhi, 19932 Vandana Shiva, "Biodiversity and IPRs: lessons from Basmati Biopiracy" and "The Basmati Patent: What it Implies? How Should India Respond?" Briefing Papers prepared for the conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity held in Bratislava, May 1998 See Also: Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), by Vandana Shiva3. Vandana Shiva, K. Vijayalakshmi, K.S. Radha, Neem: A User's Manual, RFSTNRP, New Delhi and CIKS, Madras, 1995 4. Vandana Shiva, "WTO
Rules Against Democracy and Justice in the U.S. - India TRIPS Dispute",
Briefing paper prepared for the Conference of Parties to the Convention
on Biological Diversity, Bratislava May 1998.
Brief on The Enclosure of the Commons: Biodiversity, Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights.6. Hope shand, "Harvesting diversity" RAFL 1997 7. UNDP< Agroecology: Creating the Synerginism for a Sustainable Agriculture, 1995 8. Speech delivered by Hendrik Verfaillie, President, Monsanto at the Forum on Nature and Human society, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, October 1997 9. Vandana Shiva, Betting on Biodiversity: Why Genetic Engineering Will Not Feed the Hungry, RFSTE, New Delhi 1998 10 Two Citations: a. Vandana Shiva, Betting on Biodiversity: Why Genetic engineering Will Not Feed The Hungry, RFSTE, New Delhi, 199811 Vandana Shiva, Most Farmers in India are women", FAQ, 1991 12 Two Citations: a. Vandana Shiva, The violence of Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politcs, TWN, Malaysia 1991 and the Other India Book Store, Goa, 1993 |